Mwrf 1625 Mw1114app Notes Fig 2 0

For Long-Range Communications, Is Narrowband “It”?

Nov. 21, 2014
For reliable and efficient long-range RF communications, narrowband systems may be a prime choice. A comparison of spectral efficiency, coexistence, and battery lifetime between narrowband communications and coding-gain techniques could demonstrate narrowband technique’s superiority for certain applications.

For many applications, such as remote deployments, long-range, reliable communications capability is critical. As these long-range applications begin to demand even greater data throughput from their communication links, conflicting performance requirements are starting to arise. Broad bandwidth techniques could easily enable the greater data capacities being demanded. Yet doubts arise over whether such broadband methods can cope with the environmental and electromagnetic hazards that are typical in these applications. In the white paper, “Long-Range RF Communication: Why Narrowband Is the de facto Standard,” Texas Instruments delves into this topic and the surrounding issues.

Because broadband receivers tend to be less resilient toward wireless coexistence, their range could be significantly limited by the number of interferers in the receive band.

When implementing a long-range RF communications system, power, reliability, interference, and cost can all be major concerns. For example, look at the debate between narrowband systems and broadband techniques, such as coding-gain methods. Those concerns are actually the deciding parameters when implementing long-range deployments. Because power often scales with bandwidth, interference, and throughput, the battery lifetimes of many of these systems limit the compatible technologies.

To demonstrate the comparison between narrowband and coding-gain techniques, the noise floor at several receive bandwidths is analyzed in the white paper. Here, a 10× increase in the receive bandwidth equates to an increase of 10 dB in the noise floor (or a need for an additional 10 dB of coding gain). If the increase in coding gain does not reduce the net data rate, the receive bandwidth will have to be further increased to accommodate the signal.

For public-safety and business-industrial land-mobile-radio (LMR) systems, it should be noted that Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations restrict the signal’s bandwidth to 12.5-kHz channels. Coexistence protection also is limited when using coding-gain schemes, as any interference beyond that marginal threshold will impede signal integrity. A practical narrowband system, for example, could reap up to 65 dB isolation from adjacent channels—potentially increasing robustness and battery life in multiple-radio deployments.

Texas Instruments, 12500 TI Blvd., Dallas, TX 75243; (972) 995-2011

Sponsored Recommendations

Getting Started with Python for VNA Automation

April 19, 2024
The video goes through the steps for starting to use Python and SCPI commands to automate Copper Mountain Technologies VNAs. The process of downloading and installing Python IDC...

Introduction to Copper Mountain Technologies' Multiport VNA

April 19, 2024
Modern RF applications are constantly evolving and demand increasingly sophisticated test instrumentation, perfect for a multiport VNA.

Automating Vector Network Analyzer Measurements

April 19, 2024
Copper Mountain Technology VNAs can be automated by using either of two interfaces: a COM (also known as ActiveX) interface, or a TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) socket interface...

Guide to VNA Automation in MATLAB Using the TCP Interface

April 19, 2024
In this guide, advantages of using MATLAB with TCP interface is explored. The how-to is also covered for setting up automation language using a CMT VNA.