OTA Testing Evaluates Mobile-Device Performance

April 14, 2008
To more accurately predict the real-world performance of a mobile device, both standards organizations and network providers are increasingly turning to over-the-air (OTA) testing. The Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA), ...

To more accurately predict the real-world performance of a mobile device, both standards organizations and network providers are increasingly turning to over-the-air (OTA) testing. The Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association (CTIA), for example, has defined the methods and set the standards for performing OTA testing. In a four-page white paper, RFMD (www.rfmd.com) examines test methods specified by CTIA for OTA tests on a mobile device.

Typically, mobile devices have been tested under nominal 50-Ohm conditions by connecting to the antenna connector port and performing measurements with a test source and analyzer. OTA tests are performed by placing the mobile device in an anechoic chamber. A range of test equipment is then used to evaluate its performance. The base-station simulator (BSS), for example, communicates with the mobile device using a particular protocoljust as it would in an actual call.

According to CTIA standards, mobile cellular communications devices must be tested at two frequencies: 836.5 and 1880 MHz. They also have to be tested in two positions: in free space and attached to a Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin (SAM) phantom head. During OTA testing, the main focus of evaluation is transmit and receive performance. The key parameters that are measured include total radiated power (TRP), near-horizon partial radiated power (NHPRP) values, total isotropic sensitivity (TIS), and near-horizon partial isotropic sensitivity (NHPIS) values. The note defines each of these measurements and then details how to perform them.

RFMD, 7628 Thorndike Rd., Greensboro, NC 27409-9421; (336) 664-1233, FAX: (336) 931-7454, Internet: www.rfmd.com.

Sponsored Recommendations

In-Circuit Antenna Verification

April 19, 2024
In this video, Brian Walker, Senior RF Design Engineer at Copper Mountain Technologies, shows how there can be significant variation of the performance of a PCB-mounted antenna...

UHF to mmWave Cavity Filter Solutions

April 12, 2024
Cavity filters achieve much higher Q, steeper rejection skirts, and higher power handling than other filter technologies, such as ceramic resonator filters, and are utilized where...

Wideband MMIC Variable Gain Amplifier

April 12, 2024
The PVGA-273+ low noise, variable gain MMIC amplifier features an NF of 2.6 dB, 13.9 dB gain, +15 dBm P1dB, and +29 dBm OIP3. This VGA affords a gain control range of 30 dB with...

Fast-Switching GaAs Switches Are a High-Performance, Low-Cost Alternative to SOI

April 12, 2024
While many MMIC switch designs have gravitated toward Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) technology due to its ability to achieve fast switching, high power handling and wide bandwidths...