Inside Track with Aaron Partridge, SiTime

Inside Track with Aaron Partridge, SiTime

SiTime's founder and chief scientist discusses how MEMS timing solutions are opening the doors to low-cost RF and a plethora of Internet of Things devices.

Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.

JJD: How have silicon microelectromechanical-systems (MEMS) timing solutions advanced in recent years?

AP: Timing is actually the first application of MEMS. The first devices that had all the components we now call MEMS were presented in 1967 by H.C. Nathanson, and they were resonators. But getting MEMS timing to production took a long time, dozens of Ph.D.s, and many generations of DARPA funding.

Aaron Partridge
Aaron Partridge

We released the first commercial MEMS timing devices in 2007. Since then, it has been a process of improving performance and developing parts for particular applications. For example, our recently released low-power, 32-kHz XOs (oscillators) and temperature-controlled crystal oscillators (TCXOs; precision oscillators) are designed for timekeeping in mobile devices. They took years to develop, but they are now in high-volume production.

Things are moving very quickly as we improve performance and develop new capabilities. I like to think of it as a case for Moore's Law. Because we are a semiconductor company, we need to act like one. That means that every technology generation brings a whole new level of capability.

JJD: What benefits do silicon and MEMS technology bring to timing solutions?

AP: The big picture is pretty simple: Anytime silicon can do a job, it replaces the incumbent technology. Take film, for example. We don’t photograph with film anymore. Or look at the simple floppy disk; memory sticks replaced those. Of course, the list goes on. The reasons behind each change are a bit different, but there is a common thread. Simply put, silicon does a better job with higher reliability and more versatility at a lower cost. It is the same in timing. Quartz crystals have been around since 1920. Within their limits, they have worked well. Now, quartz is getting siliconized.

Why is this? It is the leverage brought by silicon. We have invested trillions of dollars in silicon—understanding the material, developing design tools, building fabs, and educating generations of engineers in how to use it. That investment is leverage. Let’s say I want to build something in silicon. I can design with highly optimized and tested tools. I can get ultra-pure material from a variety of suppliers. I also can go to billion-dollar fabs that I don’t need to build. I can even contract with a solid infrastructure of packaging and testing suppliers. Basically, I can use silicon’s economics of scale. What could compete against that?

JJD: How are silicon-MEMS timing devices able to achieve such a high level of programmability?

AP: When an artist chooses a medium, he or she adopts the capabilities and limitations of that medium. A painter works in two dimensions, while a sculptor works in three. A filmmaker works with motion and sound. In quartz, one is generally limited to producing output frequencies at the physical resonances of the crystals. For example, 25-MHz mechanical crystals produce 25-MHz output signals. In silicon, we have circuits in our medium, so we use them. We can build phase-locked loops (PLLs) and digital-state machines. We also have nonvolatile memory to store configurations, so we can build in programmability.

PLLs are now capable of shifting reference frequencies with extreme accuracy (down to sub-parts-per-billion) with low phase noise and at low power. At the same time, we can measure temperature with amazing accuracy—better than a thousandth of a degree at a hundred-Hertz update rate. Put the two of these together and one can temperature-compensate an oscillator with fantastic accuracy. Why not allow the output frequency to be anything from 1 Hz to 500 MHz? The PLLs are there, so let's use them.

JJD: How does CMOS integration lead to higher-performing timing products, and what are the extents of that benefit?

AP: I should start by defining what we mean by “integration.” There are two types: homogeneous and heterogeneous. With homogeneous, the CMOS and MEMS components are built on one die. In contrast, heterogeneous means that they are built on separate die and packaged together. We can do either, but heterogeneous integration gives the best performance. We can optimize the MEMS and circuit processes individually. So we build the resonators on MEMS die and mount them directly onto CMOS die.

In oscillators, the first stages of the first amplifiers generally dominate the noise. When one analyzes this noise, one finds a term for the input capacitance. Increased capacitance results in more noise. In MEMS oscillators, the resonators are small and very close to the circuits, which decreases the capacitance to typically 1 pF for MEMS instead of 10 pF for quartz. One needs to be careful that the downstream circuit’s noise contributions are small as well, but that 10× head start is a big advantage. So CMOS integration can lead to lower noise.

Next are the PLLs. It may be surprising to think this way, but well-designed PLLs can reduce signal noise. At frequency offsets outside the PLL bandwidth, they can supply tremendously low phase noise that is limited only by their output dividers and driver stages. So I often say, “PLLs are our friends!” Our low-jitter oscillators provide sub-picosecond integrated jitter, thanks to the PLLs. This is part of leveraging the silicon and an example of the performance benefits we get from CMOS.

Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.

Enter IoT

Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.

JJD: How have the Internet of Things (IoT) and wearables markets embraced MEMS timing?

AP: I expect IoT to grow the semiconductor market dramatically. It will complete our third technology wave (agriculture, industrialization, communications). And MEMS timing will be at the heart of it. First, of course, every IoT device will need a clock. Most will communicate by radio. As a result, most will need both precision for RF and low power for timekeeping, so that means multiple clocks. Next, many will be small—like wearables—and powered by batteries or energy harvesting. Small size and low power are core capabilities of MEMS. We are at the very front edge of IoT and already we are seeing the pull—especially in wearables.

JJD: How well are silicon-MEMS timing solutions suited for the military/defense or aerospace markets?

AP: We are seeing interest from the military for our low-vibration sensitivity and high-shock survivability. The phase noise of quartz oscillators degrades under vibration to as much as 20 to 40 dB near carrier. In addition, quartz tends to break in shock. One can work around some of these problems in quartz, but it’s not easy. On the other hand, MEMS naturally has lower vibration sensitivity and higher shock survival because it is small.

Here is a thought experiment: Drop a small animal out of a tree, like a squirrel. What happens? It hits the ground, runs back to the tree, and climbs up again. Now think about dropping a cow. What happens? Not a good outcome for the cow. This comparison may be a bit silly, but similar scaling laws apply in both our resonators and this example. The equations for mass to surface areas, resonant frequencies, and material strength are similar. Simply put, smaller things are not affected by acceleration and shock as much as larger things.

JJD: What inspired MegaChips to acquire SiTime? How does MegaChips see SiTime aiding its business?

AP: MegaChips’ vision is to be a top-10 fabless semiconductor company. The company recognized SiTime’s growth potential and technology and market leadership. According to Yole Développement, a market research firm, MEMS timing is projected to grow 60% to 70% per year. From SiTime's perspective, the adoption of MEMS timing could accelerate if SiTime were part of a larger company with more sales, reach, and relationships. The two companies were very complementary and we both saw that right away.

Our products work perfectly together. Where you have a chip, you need a timing device to drive it. And the other way, as well—when you have a timing device, it is driving somebody’s chip. We already have key customers in common and we expect this to strengthen the adoption of our MEMS timing devices.

JJD: Now that the acquisition is final, how will SiTime’s operations change SiTime? And how will being part of MegaChips further SiTime MEMS timing products?

AP: SiTime became a wholly owned subsidiary of MegaChips this past November. We will retain the SiTime name and our headquarters in Sunnyvale, Calif. This acquisition will further accelerate the adoption of MEMS timing in several ways. MegaChips, with annual revenues of $600 million, can provide financial strength and scale. Now that SiTime is part of a large, financially stable, and publicly traded company, our large customers no longer need to worry about designing-in products from a small company. MegaChips also has a large global sales force. Because MEMS timing provides benefits for all electronic markets, any of MegaChips’ customers can use SiTime devices. This will open new opportunities for both companies while helping to advance MEMS timing.

Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.

 

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish