Tweet [Feedback] Feedback Various Readers | ED Online ID #22737 | June 2010 Dear Mr. Kumar: On p. 73 you refer to the design by Bharj et al. who designed a rectenna with a Schottky quad bridge and achieved ~80% RF/DC efficiency. Therefore, I do not understand how could you achieve an even higher efficiency by using a single-phase, singlediode rectifier diode? Such a rectifier should in principle only achieve less than 50% efficiency. Please advise. I have followed many wonderful plans by celebrated names like NASA, JAXA, etc., with microwave power transmission over short as well as long distances. Those engineers and scientists seem to include the propagation loss known since Newton: that the electromagnetic- wave power decreases with an inverse square of distance. Radio amateurs utilize the Moon to reflect their signals from it, to communicate. We use satellite communications to transmit data and TV from geostationary orbit. We pay dearly for that loss to get the information, not the power. A typical propagation loss at 5.8 GHz from the Moon is ~166 dB, from a geostationary satellite, ~156 dB. Nowhere in the publications you referred to or anywhere else could I find how the authors hope to overcome such loss. Mr. Criswell, a physicist once argued
that “a huge antenna on the Moon will
operate WITHOUT propagation loss
by focusing the power to the Earth in
the NEAR FIELD.” I would like to see
such an antenna , and see how to transmit
power without the propagation loss.
And with me I am sure thousands of satellite
communication engineers would
want to have such miraculous antennas
like planned in those projects—up to
now, not knowing such miracles, we
only know how to transmit information
by overcoming the huge propagation
loss. How can they talk about POWER
EFFICIENCY?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||














