Tweet [Components] Active Inductors Tune Low-Noise VCOs Dynamic-phase-injection techniques help to tame tunable active inductors for use in miniature monolithic VCOs that provide low phase noise while operating with low power consumption. Ulrich L. Rohde, Ajay Kumar Poddar | ED Online ID #22570 | April 2010 Inductors are a necessary building block in many circuits, including oscillators. Because passive spiral inductors can occupy a large amount of real estate in integrated-circuit (IC) designs, the search has been on for smaller, tunable active inductors (TAIs) suitable for monolithic fabrication. While smaller than passive inductors, TAIs have often meant a sacrifice in linearity and phase noise. To overcome this hurdle for creating smaller, lower-noise tunable voltage-controlled oscillators (VCOs), Synergy Microwave has developed TAI-based VCO circuits that employ dynamic phase injection so that the active inductance value changes monotonically with control voltage without degrading linearity or phase noise. Experimental oscillators suitable for high levels of integration have been fabricated using this approach, with measured phase noise of better than -110 dBc/Hz offset 1 MHz from a 12-GHz carrier. The 12-GHz VCO features a 200-MHz tuning range while requiring only 12 mA and +3-VDC bias. Radio-frequency integrated circuits (RFICs) and monolithic- microwave integrated circuits (MMICs) are often implemented in planar configurations. As is often the case, passive spiral inductors tend to dominate the real estate of these designs because of their large size, limiting the cost-effectiveness of certain designs, such as amplifiers and oscillators, especially when fabricated on expensive substrate materials such as gallium arsenide (GaAs). Ideally, those large spiral inductors could be replaced by an active inductor based on transistors and occupying only a fraction of the amount of substrate area as the passive spiral inductors. The active inductors should also provide equal if not better performance at microwave frequencies as the passive inductors. But first, one of the traditional limitations of active inductors that must be overcome is the added noise from the active devices, which can impact the performance of various components, including the phase noise of tunable oscillators. A great deal of effort has already been devoted to creating high-qualityfactor (high-Q) resonator networks for integrated tunable oscillators using active inductor technology.1-8 An activeinductor- based resonator has the same state equation as a passive inductorcapacitor (LC) resonator, along with gain and some scaling terms to compensate for the loss resistance, R, associated with a passive LC resonator. Because active inductors are based on active semiconductor devices, they require a certain amount of power to realize an inductor with negative resistance, and so will always be more dissipative than their passive inductor equivalents. It is also reasonable to expect that an active inductor will also suffer higher root-mean-square (RMS) noise than a passive inductor. The noise in an ideal passive resonator, represented by an inductor, capacitor, and associated resistance, R+, or LCR+, arises from power dissipation through the loss resistance, Rloss = R+. The mean square voltage of the thermal noise on a capacitor, kT/C, appears across the passive resonator (LCR+) regardless of the magnitude of resistance R. The selectivity of a passive resonator (ω0/Q) is established by the dissipation, according to the relationship 1/Q = (ω0L/ R+). Since noise sets the lower limit for detecting a signal in a resonator network, the upper limit may be arbitrarily large if the resonator network is assumed to be free from inductor saturation or other possible linearity issues. Tunable active inductors (TAIs), if properly implemented, offer great promise for high-performance, miniaturized tunable oscillators in RFIC and MMIC technologies. Unfortunately, they have been plagued by a number of disadvantages compared to passive inductors with comparable values when implemented in those technologies, including higher noise, lower dynamic range, higher power consumption, lower self-resonant frequency (SRF), and limited tuning bandwidth. Clearing these hurdles is critical to a more effective use of TAIs in ICs, for example in oscillators where improved Q can provide enhanced performance and for tunable filters where dynamic range is important. By using active circuitry, it may be not only to generate an on-chip inductance value of a much larger spiral inductor, but to also provide the characteristics needed to achieve low phase noise in highfrequency VCOs. A schematic diagram for an active inductor based on silicon germanium (SiGe) heterojunction-bipolar-transistor (HBT) technology is shown in Fig. 1(a), along with its tuning characteristic in Fig. 1(b). The slope of inductance with control voltage and frequency can be negative, where inductance decreases with control voltage, or positive, where inductance increases with control voltage, depending upon the TAI topology. Both tuning curves indicate strong nonlinearities under large-signal drive conditions, which have long plagued the widespread use of TAIs in highfrequency ICs. A TAI-based 12-GHz VCO based on SiGe HBT technology was developed with an active capacitor in an attempt to improve noise performance and dynamic range (not shown). For a high dynamic range, the inductor must handle relatively high power levels with low distortion. Most tunable inductors in the technical literature rely on adjusting the bias point of an active device, using the device’s transconductance (gm) as the tuned value. Unfortunately, transconductance is not linear with bias under large-signal conditions, making it almost impossible to achieve good linearity with this approach. The history of the TAI is relatively long and often based on the use of a gyrator. Early work can be traced to Dutch theorist B.D.H, Tellegen of Philips. A basic circuit using a reactance tube was designed in 1930 for electronic tuning and FM generation. Earlier researchers noted that a TAI was subject to largesignal limitations and other problems.3 An active inductor based on a gyrator can be realized by connecting inverting and non-inverting amplifier back-toback in parallel. A schematic diagram for a TAI based on SiGe HBTs, including the noise sources associated with the TAI tank circuit, is shown in Fig. 2. Part of the negative resistance, [Rv(t)], generated by the TAI can be used to minimize an oscillator’s dynamic noise. It can lower the oscillator’s power consumption by means of a reduction in the RF output current duty cycle. A typical TAI consists of a grounded active inductor, a cascade grounded inductor, and a resistive-feedback active inductor that can be implemented as part of an RFIC or MMIC. Such a circuit can be used in power dividers, quadrature couplers, and oscillators, provided it has adequate voltage-handling capability and is not current limited like a passive inductor. Unfortunately, this approach has limited dynamic range and tuning range resulting in only narrowband operation. Continue on Page 2
| ||||||||||||||||||||||














