[Feedback] Feedback Various Readers | ED Online ID #18705 | April 2008 Please Explain Correction In the February “Feedback” under ‘Misleading
Survey Results,’ what are you
trying to say in the last paragraph? It
is a negative statement and is not easily
understood. Hello Bob, My concern in asking the question was
on behalf of American Technical Ceramics,
which I have known to be an excellent
supplier of caps to many customers and I
didn’t want to see that supply jeopardized
by the takeover of a larger company that is
less known for its RF products and more
as a mainstream electronics supplier. I
didn’t mean to disparage AVX in any way,
which is a fine company and certainly will
bring financial stability to ATC. I thus felt
the need to apologize publicly, although
it may not have been clear as you have
pointed out. Clarification On Equations I would like to point out a series of errors
that appear to have occurred in the Cover
Feature of your March 2008 issue on the
Analog Devices’ low-power AD9313
direct-digital synthesizer (DDS) due to
some typesetting mistakes. In equation 1
and in the following text, the parameter
C (for number of bits) should appear as
a superscript. For example, equation 1
should appear as: Get To The Right Web Site In our March issue, the article “Synthesizers Squeeze Into Smaller Spaces” mentioned Elcom Technologies. Unfortunately, when the article was posted on our web site, it listed the wrong web address for that company. Please visit www.elcom-tech.com to learn more about Elcom Technologies. We apologize for any inconvenience.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resources

RSS














